|
Home
Gamma Knife Performed Hydrocephalus Gamma Knife Explained Constant Dizziness and Acoustic Neuroma Don't Let Your Kids Use Mobile Phones Acoustic Neuroma Picture Symptoms and Anatomy of Acoustic Neuromas Signs of Acoustic Neuroma A Randomized Controlled Trial Tinnitus Pronunciation Symptoms of Acoustic Neuroma Symptoms Vestibular schwannoma with contralateral facial pain - case report Messageboard Treatment Feedback What is Acoustic Neuroma Dr. James Wong’s Radiation Treatment Site Map Top Web Sites
Surviving
Prostate Cancer Medical Sites -
Genitourinary ProstatitisAndBPH.org How we made this site
|
Acoustic schwannomas: awareness of radiologic error will reduce unnecessary treMarshall AH, Owen VM, Nikolopoulos TP, O'Donoghue GMOtol Neurotol. 2005 May;26(3):512-5.. Department of Otolaryngology, Queen's Medical Center NHS Trust, University Hospital, Nottingham, UK. OBJECTIVE: To measure the intra- and interobserver error in size estimation of acoustic schwannomas from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans by experienced radiologists to determine whether small amounts of tumor growth that may affect management (2 mm) could be reliably measured in clinical practice. DESIGN: Duplicated, blinded size estimation of acoustic neuromas (according to American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines, 1995) from MRI scans of patients with acoustic neuromas. SETTING: Tertiary referral teaching hospital and DGH. PARTICIPANTS: Four radiologists (including 2 dedicated neuroradiologists) measuring positive MRI scans of 26 patients with an acoustic neuroma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Intraradiologist and inter-radiologist repeatability coefficients in millimeters for the maximal tumor diameter in the anteroposterior (AP) axis, medial-longitudinal (ML) axis, and the square-root of the product of these two measurements. Repeatability coefficients give the 95% range within which the differences in repeated measurements lie. RESULTS: The intraradiologist repeatability for AP and ML measurements ranged from 1.51 to 6.03 mm and 2.01 to 3.83 mm, respectively. The repeatability of the square-root of the product ranged from 1.43 to 4.94 mm. The inter-radiologist repeatability was 6.48 mm and 7.46 mm for the AP and ML measurements, respectively, giving a repeatability of 3.65 mm for the square-root of the product. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that, in routine clinical practice, differences in tumor size of the order of 2 mm cannot be reliably measured, even by the same radiologist. Thus, reported growth of acoustic tumors should be interpreted with caution, especially if this is the criterion for recommending treatment.< This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Acoustic Neuroma Foundation website. This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline. Men's Health Web RingSurvivingProstateCancerWithoutSurgery.org VasectomyFoundation.org Prostatitis Foundation ( Prostatitis.org) Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns that you may have. You must see your own physician for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the information on this site is never guaranteed to be 100% accurate or 100% up to date. All the side effects of mentioned treatments, drugs, surgeries, or therapies cannot always be listed or be known. Errors and omissions may occur in any essay. See a competent physician for your health care needs. http://www.acousticneuromafoundation.org™ Established December 11, 2002 |
|