|
Home
Gamma Knife Performed Hydrocephalus Gamma Knife Explained Constant Dizziness and Acoustic Neuroma Don't Let Your Kids Use Mobile Phones Acoustic Neuroma Picture Symptoms and Anatomy of Acoustic Neuromas Signs of Acoustic Neuroma A Randomized Controlled Trial Tinnitus Pronunciation Symptoms of Acoustic Neuroma Symptoms Vestibular schwannoma with contralateral facial pain - case report Messageboard Treatment Feedback What is Acoustic Neuroma Dr. James Wong’s Radiation Treatment Site Map Top Web Sites
Surviving
Prostate Cancer Medical Sites -
Genitourinary ProstatitisAndBPH.org How we made this site
|
SPET assessment of auditory cortex stimulation and tonotopic spatial distribution in auditory brainstem iDi Nardo W, Picciotti P, Di Giuda S, De Rossi G, Paludetti GActa Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2004 Dec;24(6):321-5.. ENT Institute, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy. pmpicciotti@rm.unicatt.it Activation of the auditory cortex by multifrequency acoustic stimuli has been evaluated using Single Photon Emission Tomography in a case of auditory brainstem implant after activation of 6 and 11 electrodes. Before implantation, no activation of the auditory cortex has been observed after acoustic stimulation. Following auditory brainstem implant, the stimulation of 11 electrodes showed an activation value, in terms of blood flow increase, of the contralateral temporal cortex similar to that obtained with 6 electrodes (47.70 vs. 43.76%), but a significantly stronger activation was present in the contralateral parietal region (29.59 vs. 14.73%), in the homolateral temporal area (22.02 vs. 10.46%) and, especially, in the homolateral parietal zone (16.6 vs. 4.33%). The strongest activation in the contralateral temporal cortex was detected in the sagittal tomogram at 26.25 mm from the midline, that is in the areas where high frequencies are projected, both with 6 and 11 active electrodes. The medio-lateral auditory cortex, where the middle and lower frequencies are projected, showed an overall lower activation which was however significantly lower with 6-electrode stimulation. Stimulation of the surface of cochlear nuclei determines mainly an activation of the high frequency domain, independently of the electrodes number. This finding may explain the better results of cochlear implants in comparison with auditory brainstem implant and could justify the use of needle electrodes in auditory brainstem implant. In conclusion, Single Photon Emission Tomography can be considered useful in evaluating auditory brainstem implant placement and function. It is also able to define the effectiveness of acoustic stimulation, the degree and tonotopic spatial distribution of auditory cortex activation.< This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Acoustic Neuroma Foundation website. This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline. Men's Health Web RingSurvivingProstateCancerWithoutSurgery.org VasectomyFoundation.org Prostatitis Foundation ( Prostatitis.org) Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns that you may have. You must see your own physician for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the information on this site is never guaranteed to be 100% accurate or 100% up to date. All the side effects of mentioned treatments, drugs, surgeries, or therapies cannot always be listed or be known. Errors and omissions may occur in any essay. See a competent physician for your health care needs. http://www.acousticneuromafoundation.org™ Established December 11, 2002 |
|