|
Home
Gamma Knife Performed Hydrocephalus Gamma Knife Explained Constant Dizziness and Acoustic Neuroma Don't Let Your Kids Use Mobile Phones Acoustic Neuroma Picture Symptoms and Anatomy of Acoustic Neuromas Signs of Acoustic Neuroma A Randomized Controlled Trial Tinnitus Pronunciation Symptoms of Acoustic Neuroma Symptoms Vestibular schwannoma with contralateral facial pain - case report Messageboard Treatment Feedback What is Acoustic Neuroma Dr. James Wong’s Radiation Treatment Site Map Top Web Sites
Surviving
Prostate Cancer Medical Sites -
Genitourinary ProstatitisAndBPH.org How we made this site
|
Bone-anchored hearing AIDS in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurHol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CWOtol Neurotol. 2005 Sep;26(5):999-1006.. From the Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. OBJECTIVE:: To evaluate the benefit of a bone-anchored hearing aid contralateral routing of sound hearing aid (BAHA CROS hearing aid) in 29 patients with unilateral inner ear deafness. STUDY DESIGN:: Prospective clinical follow-up study. SETTING:: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS:: Thirty patients were recruited. There were 19 patients with a history of acoustic neuroma surgery and 11 patients with unilateral inner ear deafness due to other causes; 1 patient was excluded. The first 21 patients had also participated in a previous evaluation. INTERVENTION:: Audiometric measurements were taken before intervention, when fitted with a conventional CROS, and after BAHA implementation. Patients' subjective benefit was quantified with four different hearing aid-specific instruments: the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids, and the Single-Sided Deafness questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: The same instruments were used at a mean long-term follow-up of 1 year after BAHA implantation. RESULTS:: Sound localization in an audiologic test setting was no different from chance level. The main effect of the BAHA CROS that was found was the "lift the head shadow" effect in the speech-in-noise measurements. All instruments also showed positive results in favor of the BAHA CROS at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS:: The poor sound-localization results in an audiologic test setting illustrated the inability of patients with unilateral inner ear deafness to localize sounds. The speech-in-noise measurements demonstrated the efficacy of the BAHA CROS to lift the head shadow. Patients were still satisfied at 1-year follow-up, according to the four instruments.< This abstract is being posted for educational purposes, as well as for comment and criticism, by the visitors to the Acoustic Neuroma Foundation website. This abstract is representative of a larger article that is indexed on Medline. Men's Health Web RingSurvivingProstateCancerWithoutSurgery.org VasectomyFoundation.org Prostatitis Foundation ( Prostatitis.org) Disclaimer: Information provided on this web site is for educatonal purposes only. It is not a substitute for, nor can it replace advice from your own physician. The information on this site is not to be used for diagnosing or treating any health concerns that you may have. You must see your own physician for diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, the information on this site is never guaranteed to be 100% accurate or 100% up to date. All the side effects of mentioned treatments, drugs, surgeries, or therapies cannot always be listed or be known. Errors and omissions may occur in any essay. See a competent physician for your health care needs. http://www.acousticneuromafoundation.org™ Established December 11, 2002 |
|